Synopsis
A young man races to save his son's life, but death – incarnated in the child's imagination as the titular Erl King – calls unceasingly.
A young man races to save his son's life, but death – incarnated in the child's imagination as the titular Erl King – calls unceasingly.
Part 1 of the February Film Challenge
1st Marie-Louise Iribe
A brief piece of French Fantastique made with limited sound technology, The Erl King is best when it conjures a world of fairies and spirits through its elaborate superimpositions. The Toad-Man's rather corny costume works quite well when subjected to that shimmering, translucent quality that compliments the beautiful natural scenery that seems to have been achieved on location. The Goethe poem and the Schubert song are both incorporated into narrative in a very elegant manner, too. However, the quality of the sound equipment is so primitive that it drags the story down. There's a fine line between slow and reverent and just clunky, and the primitive editing of the sound…
Goethe, fantasy elements, special effects ala 1931, and cinematography out in the woods at night … hey, I’m in. The effect of the sinister erl king and his scantily clad fairies is achieved using overlays which don’t always work perfectly with the underlying images, but convey the ethereal sense of the story and its spooky danger, and visually the film is beautiful. I liked reading Goethe’s words at the outset but I’m not sure about the choice of telling the entire story this way, since we then know what’s coming, and it’s already pretty simple. However, there’s something truly charming and poetic about this fairy tale set to early celluloid, and it’s well worth spending 45 minutes on. It makes me wish Marie-Louise Iribe had made more films as a director.
Marie-Louise Iribe had directed one silent picture previously. The Erl King has sound. I liked the shot which had a reflection in a toad's eye.
Vegan alert:
Horseback riding
A dreamy adventure into death. Bizarre fantasy film with fairies dancing around as a father travels the land to try and save his dying boy. Certainly something unique to experience from this period.
Dem Vater grauset’s; er reitet geschwind,
Er hält in den Armen das ächzende Kind
Die durchgängige, klassisch-ouvertürenartige Vertonung Franz Schuberts der Ballade von Goethe kann irgendwann doch etwas nerven. Und die Vorgeschichte ist mit 20 Minuten gefühlt unnötig lang.
Aber die recht alte Verfilmung vom Ritt des Vaters mit seinem sterbenskranken Sohn durch einen Wald liefert viele stimmungsvolle Spezialeffekte. Die mit putzigen Projektionstricks in den Wald und die Natur gesetzten Märchengestalten, die das Kind in seinem Fieberwahn sieht reichen vom mal 10 Meter großen Erlkönig im Kettenhemd, von diesem aus Blättern, Spinnen und toten Singvögeln erschaffenen Feenwesen (anscheinend Mitgliedern der lokalen Ausdruckstanz-Gruppe), bis zu Nixen und einem Krötenmann im nebeligen Moor.
Auch die Dramatik steigt spürbar Richtung "Ende"; und das…
A poetic tale all parts beautiful and tragic that benefits from a strong visual flair and a masterful soundtrack, especially for the early sound period. Just short enough that it never overstays its welcome and you can feast your eyes on the film in front of you.
Early French sound film but this one is all about the images. Hauntingly beautiful and ethereal, dissolving mists, menacing toad king, fairies flickering in and out of vision. That final overhead shot in the cathedral is one for the ages. A fine adaptation of the Goethe fairy tale.
The atmosphere here is very eerie and cinematic. Definitely a worthwhile early French sound film that won't take up much of anyone's time.
48/100
100 Horror Movies in 92 Days 2021 27/100
A touch drawn out for something only 46 minutes? Nothing egregious here, but gets old about 30-35 minutes in. No particular problems or praises, absent the over-reliance on double exposure which gets a tad obnoxious after a while. Definition of mid, but still manages some cool moments and images when it moves away from the aforementioned double-exposure problem. The water-related imagery worked quite well and is probably the element I'll be taking out of this film. Issues aside, it's always interesting to see something made right after the advent of sound since it's still sharing so much visual and formal language with silents, despite remaining sound which is something we'll never be able to see again(this goes for silents too--The Artist does a pretty good job of showcasing why the language of silents will never be imitated properly). Anyways, glad I watched it, but not really any strong feelings either way.